![radeon hd 8610g vs geforce gtx 275 radeon hd 8610g vs geforce gtx 275](https://static.userbenchmark.com/resources/static/gpu/Nvidia-GTX-275.jpg)
One confusing aspect of these cards up to this point has been the pricing.
![radeon hd 8610g vs geforce gtx 275 radeon hd 8610g vs geforce gtx 275](https://gepig.com/gpu/radeon-r7-240_01_290w.jpg)
Some interpretations of this product is that it was a result of NVIDIA’s quick action to compete with ATI, since the product isn’t that different from the other cards we just mentioned, but while the Core clock isn’t that much lower, the Shader clock is 72MHz lower, so that should noticeably help differentiate itself from the GTX 285. NVIDIA’s GTX 275, on the other hand, becomes the second-lowest offering in their G200 chip series, and sits above the GTX 260/216 and below the GTX 285. For example, ATI’s HD 4890 becomes the company’s fastest single-GPU offering, and with 100MHz added to the Core clock over the HD 4870, we should be seeing some noticeable differences in our results today. Redīoth of today’s graphics cards fall into the mid-range category, but each settle in at a slightly different place in the respective company’s line-up. We have a lot to talk about here, so let’s get right to it. NVIDIA continues to tout their PhysX physics acceleration, while ATI continue to push DirectX 10.1. What’s a little strange about both of these cards, though, is that it’s not the cards themselves that are too interesting, but rather the current technologies surrounding them. The reason NVIDIA bumped up their date is because the GTX 275 is designed to compete with the HD 4890 head-on, from both a performance and price perspective. If either card was in a different price-range or category, a rare occurrence such as this would not have happened. Although ATI has had their April 2nd embargo date set in stone for a little while, NVIDIA decided just last week to follow-suit, and as a result, we’re going to be taking a look at both cards in this single article. As it usually happens, one company will release a new product and the other will follow-up weeks later. Both companies had a lot to talk about at the show, and we’ll be discussing some of the more interesting points here.īefore we dive too deep into things, let’s tackle the obvious question of why we’re reviewing two new products from fierce competitors on the same day. With the Game Developers Conference taking place just last week, we learned from both ATI and NVIDIA of what’s in store for the near-future, and also what’s happening now. Have a nice day and maybe try and get it right next time.The past few weeks for graphics cards have been quite interesting, for a couple of different reasons. Im just so mind boggled i guess i have a unique 4830 that out performs 4870x2's and stuff. i over clocked my card to 6 and i averaged almost 40fps in all gamer with half of my settings on enthuesist. oh and my system is all stock no overclock. Is your test platform a pentium 4? but pls you can let me know how you came up with those benchmarks. now if you are meaning enthuesist settings when you say high for warhead.
#Radeon hd 8610g vs geforce gtx 275 drivers
Are you trying to run the cards on a nvidia north bridge with no drivers installed or what? Once again terrible reviews of these cards. hmmmmmmmm and your 4890 is only 28fps hmmmmmm once again. So now lets get back to where your hd 4870x2 is only running at 32fps. i run crysis warhead on all gamer settings, aka high settings for crysis. i have a amd phenom II 920 with 4gigs of ddr2 1066 ram and a ati hd4830.
![radeon hd 8610g vs geforce gtx 275 radeon hd 8610g vs geforce gtx 275](https://dev1.notebook-check.com/fileadmin/Notebooks/MSI/GF75_8RD-001/New_LoL_logo_ON_WHITE.jpg)
Alrighty, im curious to see where in the hell you are comming up with these benchmarks for crysis warhead.